data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af4c5/af4c5de61d81feba679a66397486fc4a310c1d94" alt=""
At my first Lilly (2013), I presented a poster with three of my colleagues (Rebecca Pierce, Lynne Stallings, and Petra Zimmermann) titled “Classroom Interaction Redefined: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Moving Beyond Traditional Classroom Spaces to Promote Student Engagement.” We translated this into a journal article, which was recently published online.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60280/6028043977cd336f8f959653c6d584f1b7fa0052" alt=""
Every time I’ve attended Lilly, I’ve come away from the experience rejuvenated. When you spend time in conversations with others excited and interested in finding the best way to teach, how can you not become excited yourself? The conference attendees are a very friendly group of people. One has a sense of attending a homecoming and getting reacquainted with old friends when one attends Lilly.
Rather than try to detail everything I absorbed at the conference this year, I’m simply going to provide a list of very briefly annotated quotes I wrote down while listening to presenters. I’m not going into depth partly because I don’t have the time to do so right now, and partly because I’m yet to fully process most of what I experienced. They are presented here in the order in which I experienced them.
- “Get more sleep.” We have to have adequate sleep for our brains to make memories.
- “We can't solve our problems with the same thinking we used to create them.” Time to think outside of the box.
- “Give authority to students and be prepared to be amazed.” I’ve had this experience many times, as recently as a week ago with honors colloquium students.
- “Memorizing is what you do when something doesn't make sense.” To truly learn something, it has to make sense.
- “What would students do if we gave them wrong or missing instructions?” Should we do this to make them think and question?
- “Students must have past knowledge to which they can connect the new information we give them.” Our brains store new information by attaching it to previous knowledge and experiences.
- “Test for what you want your students to know a year from now.” If it’s not important enough that you want the student to know it a year from now, why test them on it? What does it matter if they know it now?
- “Peer feedback should be thought of as reciprocal teaching, not an evaluation.” This changes the nature of the conversation.
- “Flipped learning may not be evidenced by short term assessments gains but will be reflected in long term knowledge.” Learners can cram for a test and do well but are much less likely to remember it later. True learning is for the long term.
- “We can’t change what we cannot see.” If we don’t know there is an issue, how could we know it needs changed? We have to look and observe.
- “What are the things going on in our students lives? How might those things affect their learning? How could it change our teaching if we knew?” We must do more than simply teach content.
- “Everything we do is a rehearsal for the future.” Extremely few things are ever done only once. Always strive to do better.
- “Impatience is the enemy of empathy.” Take time to understand.
- “Grades should be indicative of the quality and quantity of learning.” The key here is measuring learning, not testing.
Share your thoughts below. What quotes resonate with you? What ones raise questions? Do you find fault with any of them?
The last one feels a bit like a straw man to me. Is there anyone who would disagree with that? I wonder about the context in which it was brought up.
ReplyDeleteI'll be curious to see what others think as well. I believe that one came from a presentation about specs grading.
DeleteSometimes memorization is the impetus to understanding. As in "this is a fact--but WHY is it a fact"? For example, back in the day when I took calculus, I knew how to do the integrations and had memorized the formulas (don't ask me to repeat them now, though!) It wasn't until I took a course with radiation physics, though, that I fully comprehended the concepts of integration. There is nothing wrong in trusting the process (i.e. I don't quite get this NOW but I will in the future). Memorization gets a not-always-deserved bad rap and frankly, badmouthing is is kind of lazy (in my esteemed opinion).
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. Sometimes we do need to memorize something until we have an opportunity to make sense of it. I think the emphasis behind the statement was that if something doesn't make sense to us, we're not likely to remember it long term--unless we use it "every" day, in which case we re-memorize it each time we use it. It it makes sense to us, I think we're more likely to remember it long term, or can reconstruct the parts we forget because of our understanding.
Delete